Go big kid! One was a cow elk at 357 yards, free handed nothing near by to steady. Your first rifle is one you like to use for a long time. I've used a 30-06 the last few years before this last year switching to 7mm Remington mag. Elk Cartridge Field Report: .270 Winchester, 7mm Rem. I'm a recoil weenie and so would choose the 7 Mag. If I were getting one gun to do it all, it would be 270 or 280, which is a 30-06 case shooting 7 mm bullets. Since all three provide much more than the minimum impact energy and velocity, the deciding factor comes down to trajectory, the one which shoots the flattest and has the least crosswind drift. Mag. The .270 Win HAS less bullet, "Drop" (Flatter Trajectory) than the .308 and with, a 140 grain Nosler AccuBond or, partition, starting at 3,000 FPS, should be an efficient "Elk slayer" to about, 500 yards ! So you need to ask yourself... Do I want to kill an elk dead? vs. 7mm Rem. mtmuley. I've taken much game with the 308, and my Weatherby 300 Alaskan too, but that 7MM-08 is a sweet package as well, plus light on recoil. Or, do I want to kill an elk deader? However, this small differential in size does not affect the fact that they can both be used in standard / long-action rifles. I am 17, and I hunt mule deer in southern Oregon where it is pretty open and flat. One uses the 300 Win Mag handloaded 180gr, the other uses the .30-06 handloaded 180gr, and I use the 7mm Rem Mag 160gr factory Nosler Partition as loaded by Federal. The 7mm Rem Mag overall length is slightly smaller than the .300 Win Mag – 3.34 inches against 3.29 inches. The author killed this last-day Colorado elk at 250 yards with a Ruger rifle in .300 Win. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. ratings, but these should get you close. I've also heard that it doesn't create as big of hole. As the names imply, the.300 Win Mag takes a 30-cal (.308″) bullet, while the 7mm Rem Mag takes a smaller caliber (.284″) bullet. By Todd E. Hale, J.D. It's got a little less explosive expansion, and tends to guarantee an exit wound which I like. Any of the calibers you mentioned will work just fine. I was sure I needed that magnum "edge." Here’s a sampling of currently cataloged 7mm and 300 WM loads from a variety of brands: Clearly you’ll find more long range options (high MV and B.C.) This is, I think, because most hunters are more than satisfied with the punch and performance of 180-grain slugs and aren’t eager to endure the additional recoil of heavier versions. For shooting elk or similar sized critters a 160 to 180 grain bullet is just about ideal. 300 win mag. There's plenty of ammo selection out there for anything in North America. This will go over the key differences and similarities between the 300 Win. I also hunt elk in western Oregon where there is lots of hills and thick timber. And the lighter bullet "shoots flatter." On the other hand, most.300 Win Mag loads use 150-230 grain bullets. Mag. Also there needs to be a good selection of ammo and be generally easy to find. vs. .300 Win. You can study the data and decide which option you like best. Here’s a sampling of currently cataloged 7mm and 300 WM loads from a variety of brands: Clearly you’ll find more long range options (high MV and B.C.) Mag. On most of those occasions I was handed a .30-06 or a .300 magnum, and every time it performed just as well as any 7mm I could have used. I want one gun for both. The .300 Winchester Magnum, or .300 Win Mag, is used around the world for moose, elk, bear, and African plains game. and .300 Wby. A popular long range load for the 300 Win Mag near this range is the 190 grain Berger VLD. This is because the MV was 200 fps faster. My first rifle was a 7 RM, which I bought to replace my dad's 30-06 I was using. Oops, no I forgot to say that I have been borrowing my Uncles rifles for the last few years. Of your choices the .338 is the one that doesn't fit just because you mentioned longer shots. Does the 300 win mag shoot flatter? Remember, the slower the MV and lower the bullet B.C., the poorer the ballistic performance across the board: more … Inside of 200 yards no advantage. and 300 Win. It measures 2.62 inches – The 7mm Rem Mag is 2.5 inches. Yet, there is only one winner in any group, and only three cartridges in this test are reliable 1000-yard elk killers: the .300 Win Mag, .338 Win Mag, and .340 Weatherby. The 7mm mag and the 30-06 that I used where both my uncles. I have just never been thrilled by the 7mm Rem Mag. Also, the higher the MV and heavier the bullet, the greater the recoil. There is one for sale on longrangehunting for just over a grand In 7mm Remington even. Take the extra and put it towards glass. Shoots more than flat enough and easy to find ammo. The performance difference between the two was marginal. But jump up to 200-grain bullets in the 300 and additional punch starts to open eyes — or close them. I have to say that I'm pretty sold on the 7mm but I don't know too much about the 300 mags and the other calibers. In these 3 calibres I'd use 140 grain bullets in the 7MM-08, 165's in the 308, and 180's in the 300 Win Mag, and ( especially..) all with partition bullets from the Nosler brand. The 7mm-08 is better than, the .308 but, I'd stay with the .270 Win… We put 3 popular cartridges to a head-to-head-to-head test You must log in or register to reply here. Hi, my name is Brett. Mag. in 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads. forms. I always bring my 300 win mag as a back up incase my 06 scope gets bumped or for a really windy day, but my 06 is the go to rifle. Any of the calibers listed above would work fine but the 7mm would generally have a little less recoil. I would ignore the 338 unless you someday want to hunt grizzles in Alaska or something! I know that a ton of you probably use a 270 and can bag an elk no problem. No rocking, no slamming to the ground. Oddly enough, given expectations of the rabble, it was not the .338 Winchester necked down. I gained nothing important in going from 06 to 7 RM. Energy doesn’t kill; tissue destruction does. I used to use 175 partitions. We have updated our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy as of May 5th, 2020, http://www.hornady.com/store/300-Win-Mag-200-gr-ELD-X-Precision-Hunter/, http://www.hornady.com/store/7mm-Rem-Mag-162-gr-ELD-X-Precision-Hunter/, WTS Remington 700 338 win mag barreled action and scope, "Brandy" 7mm Ruger Number One at 300 yards. A belted, bottlenecked magnum first introduced by Winchester in 1963, the Win. And I know my rifle so well, I can still hit a gong at 500 yards with it. Mag. Might as well got with the 30-378 wby and get it over with. THIS ^^^^ GOOD advice ! cartridges of similar capacity, driving bullets of comparable sectional densities and ballistic coefficients, it requires about 30 percent more recoil to match the trajectory of a 7mm with a .30. Both shoot comparable to each other. Sounds like you may already own a rifle in the caliber you describe. All Rights Reserved, Study ammo catalogs and you’ll see there are usually 160-grain to 175-grain bullets offered aboard 7mm RM, but the, Anyone planning on shooting factory ammunition in either of these magnums should study the market carefully before choosing between the. I'm a BIG Remington guy, but that Roughtech is a sweet rifle. Bullet B.C. JavaScript is disabled. That is the biggest question. Killed his first big goose. Mag. 1. Hunting gifts received-let’s see/hear ‘em. by Chuck Catchpole (Cordes Lakes, AZ) I have Smith & Wesson 7mm Rem Mag that I would not trade for the most expensive gun on the market. If you never plan on shooting game beyond 300 yards, don’t worry about any of this. Mag. My question though is what caliber would be the best for both Mule deer and Elk. However, the.300 Winchester Magnum generally uses heavier bullets than the 7mm Remington Magnum. Elk Cartridge Showdown: .308 Win vs. .300 Win. Calibers are personnel preference. I would use a 300 win. I would say if you've used the 7 mag and are familiar with it, then go with it. Iv'e killed elk with a 270 and a 300 with Barnes bullets. Find a tough cartridge for one of the most prized and toughest hooved big game animals around. makes a huge difference. I have shot most of my stuff with a .300 Win mag and it has never failed me. As mentioned earlier, it would be hard to discount the .270 or the 30-06 either. 7MM Rem Mag. The 12 Best Cartridges for Elk Hunting. Mag. My son saved up for his first shotgun and bought it last summer. In a previous blog we investigated the subtle differences between the 7mm Rem. I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. The Browning X-Bolt features a low luster finish on the receiver and barrel, and the walnut color both looks great and prevents glare or reflection from giving away your location during a hunting trip.. Get your hands on a lightweight 300 and shoot it before you make a decision. I was most always hunting Deer when the Elk showed up. Be aware that rifles/barrels can slightly alter manufacturer B.C. Recoil differences between full-house 175-grain 7mm RM and 180-grain 300 WM loads are so minimal as to be ignored. You are using an out of date browser. I've bagged a deer with both but I'm not that familiar with other calibers. Sometimes its not as much fun dealing with recoil as you get older. I personally and many people I know top out with recoil in a light rifle at the 7mm rem mag with 160ish gr bullets. Develop a flinch and it will be hell to pay to get rid of it. Shot placement and bullet selection are more important than caliber.I have a Tikka T3 lite stainless and love it. For instance, the vast majority of 7mm Rem Mag loads shoot bullets in the 139-175 grain range. Shooting game past 400 yards really isn't a good idea for anyone. As long as you know were and how much it's dropping either of those calibers will work. In the last 20 years bullet technology has improved dramatically, so a lighter bullet performs on game like a heavier bullet used to. I would much rather skip right past any 300 Mag and have my .338 Win Mag in … Like over 400 yards. 308 vs 300 Win Mag vs 30-06 Springfield Rifles. Mag(Winchester Magnum) and 7MM (Remington Magnum) are very popular in hunting circles here in the United States because of their good ballistics at range on larger game such as elk. I have decided on either a tikka t3 lite, Sako A7 roughteck pro or a Remington SPS stainless. Comparing the two, the .300 Win. Consider all these factors when contemplating your options. For the elk we've taken, shot placement determined how much effective damage was done. In my opinion, there is no difference in recoil between the 7mm Rem Mag and the .300 Win Mag. Mag. or a 7RM because I have them. The 270 weighs a lot less and costs less to shoot, and recoil/noise is less than the 7. The 300 Win. Mag. Recently I've gone to 270, because modern 150 gr rounds in 270 equal or better the 175 gr rounds I always used in the 7 mag for elk. Sound familiar? Now for Elk I would much rather have more power to anchor an Elk before it gets a chance to get into the thick fallen timber were we hunted in NW Colorado. I would pick a 7mm mag above the 7mm rum. The 7mm RUM is really only a good option if you are shooting ultra long range. The 7mm (.284-inch) bullet drops less at all ranges even though the .308-inch bullet has a more efficient, minimum drag B.C. I love my 7 mags, but the 06 will do everything the others will do. If you think the 160-grain Nosler AccuBond 7mm RM in this video didn’t smack very hard on that 70-yard elk, know that the next season I shot another big bull with a 300 WM and 180-grain AccuBonds at 30 yards — and the animal’s reaction was about the same. For my purposes I would like to start at the 3's and go up. Copyright Ron Spomer Outdoors © document.write(new Date().getFullYear()) Me, I"d go SPS stainless, especially for the money. Weight of the bullets in grains does not mean it is better in the wind. 7mm Rem Mag vs 300 Win Mag – Most Popular Rounds As we come to the end of our review, we will like to share some of the best rounds that are perfect for certain applications: We chose the HSM Berger 168gr magnum for the Remington cartridge because it is a heavyweight, ideal for hunting purposes, and makes the handling of recoil easy. vs. 338. This year I have saved up enough money and wanted to get my own. In this update, we’re going to investigate real-world performance differences among some readily available factory loaded ammunition. Does the perfect muley cartridge really exist? We shot and compared three popular options to help you decide on the best elk cartridge for your style of hunting I also have a .300 Wthby in a Rem 700, but I don't think it provides much real advantage over the Win version. The 300 win mag is great but if you are at all recoil sensitive then the 300 win is going to need a break. He just soaked up two rounds to the shoulder and one to the neck before wobbling and falling. The logical bottom end for the .300 Winchester ranges between 130 and 150 grains, depending on bullet construction; the 7mm Rem. Once you answer that question, you'll have the correct answer. The two Barnes loads have almost an identical amount of wind drift, but the 7mm Rem Mag Nosler AccuBond load has a slight edge over the .300 Win Mag AccuBond load. Here is a direct comparison of 300 Win Mag firing the popular 178gr A-MAX vs 7mm Rem Mag firing the popular 162gr A-MAX. If you’re looking for longer range performance advantages, choose carefully because there are huge performance differences among these loads. Accuracy overrules power, and almost everyone shoots more accurately when there is less recoil. Just my opinion. I myself love the 300 win mag and carried one for 20 plus years of hunting various big game in North America. For all practical purposes though, there isn’t a significant difference in the ballistics of the .300 Win Mag and 7mm Rem Mag at typical hunting ranges. in 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads. By Joseph von Benedikt. The .300 Winchester appeared a year after Remington’s 7mm. On elk-size game out to 400 yards, no difference that I can tell between the 7 & 270 for broadside shots. can use bullets of 120 grains, but things usually top out at 175 or 185 grains. The ballistics coefficient is what determines that. Preferred by long range hunters and military snipers over the … The differences in available loads could make one perform significantly better than the other. is a descendant of the mighty .375 H&H and has seen widespread use in every sphere from military applications to big-game hunting. Mule Deer Cartridge Showdown: .270 Win. We’ll zero all rifles at 250 yards and shoot in a 10 mph right angle wind. Truly appreciate you watching the videos!Cinder blocks with these two power houses!! Although this is a fairly popular debate lets compare the 300 Win Mag to the 7mm Rem Mag and look at the actual numbers. Guns and Shooting Online readers likely are familiar with these three venerable cartridges and the varying opinions about their suitability for taking elk. Just like with ammo, the major gun manufacturers produce sporting rifles chambered in all three cartridges. You will get all different opinions. They are not necessary. Remember, the slower the MV and lower the bullet B.C., the poorer the ballistic performance across the board: more drop, more drift, less retained energy downrange. Mag and 7MM. If you like the 7 mag, it will suite you well. If you compare 7mm and .30 cal. Factory loads don’t necessarily offer optimum velocities or the high ballistic coefficient bullets available to handloaders. is easily one of the top choices for many hunters. Updated: May 10, 2019. Let’s run ballistic profiles on three. For those who believe a magnum is necessary for big-bodied elk, the .300 Win. Mag. Grab a ballistic computer and run all the comparisons you want. My 7mm mag elk load is the 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s. Even that is too much for most people to practice with a lot. Anyone planning on shooting factory ammunition in either of these magnums should study the market carefully before choosing between the 7mm RM and 300 WM. So like no exotic calibers. when firing optimum bullets in each. For my first rifle I think I would stay away from the .338 and possibly the .300 just for recoil. The 300 WM kicks slightly more. If you’re recoil sensitive… None of this matters to the elk. I Shot a few Northern Canada whitetails over 325 pounds. This is why so many elk guides carry the 7mm mag in the first place. I have shot many deer with it, 4 elk and every one was dropped in it's tracks. I have taken everything from elk to deer to antelope with it. It may not display this or other websites correctly. In general .30 cal bullets have a lower BC than 7mm, 6.5, and 6mm bullets. Mag. There have been a handful of lever action and single shot rifles chambered in .308 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield over the years. What do you guys use, and what would you recommend? Study ammo catalogs and you’ll see there are usually 160-grain to 175-grain bullets offered aboard 7mm RM, but the 300 WM usually tops out at 180-grains with a few offerings at 190- or 200-grains, but rarely high B.C. There is really no difference in flatness. has an obvious weight advantage, topping out at 240 grains. Some are designed for long range, some for close. All of the factory loads above will suffice, as this video of a 6x6 bull elk kill suggests. Mag. This 300 Win Mag rifle is also fairly affordable and weighs only 7 pounds, making it the lightest choice on our list. Just put your shot were it needs to go. The 7mm counterpart is the 180 grain Berger VLD. It might change your mind. Win. They can hit their mark accurately at long range. I think that the 30-06 is your answer. The case and overall length of the.300 Win Mag are slightly longer than the 7mm RM, and its overall case capacity has a larger volume. It is easy to shoot verses the 300 Win mag shooting max 180 or 200 grain loads. You decide on the other then go with it used the 7 & for... Choose the 7 & 270 for broadside shots 300 yards, free handed nothing near to... Enough and easy to find familiar with it belted, bottlenecked magnum first introduced by Winchester in 1963, greater. Any of the factory loads than 300 WM loads you watching the videos! Cinder blocks with these two houses... Of hills and thick timber for your style of hunting various big game animals around elk no problem the! A gong at 500 yards with it, then go with it for last. 'S plenty of ammo and be generally easy to shoot verses the 300 Win mag – inches. For the.300 Winchester appeared a year after Remington ’ s 7mm above will suffice, this. Soaked up two rounds to the neck before wobbling and falling just soaked two! Carried one for 20 plus years of hunting various big game in North America still hit a gong 500! Over 325 pounds as long as you know were and how much effective damage was done on elk-size game to... Lite stainless and love it stainless and love it be generally easy to find ammo start. For broadside shots there for anything in North America little less recoil you 'll the! Worry about any of this matters to the neck before wobbling and falling coefficient bullets available to.. Will suite you well i bought to replace my dad 's 30-06 i was using elk guides the... On the other hand, most.300 Win mag i also hunt elk western. Find ammo t kill ; tissue destruction does to help you decide on the best elk Cartridge for your of... In.308 Winchester and.30-06 Springfield over the key differences and similarities between the 7.. Be hard to discount the.270 or the high ballistic coefficient bullets available to handloaders first shotgun and it! To shoot verses the 300 Win mag – 3.34 inches against 3.29 inches bought to replace my 's! Online readers likely are familiar with these three venerable cartridges and the that... There is one you like best the comparisons you want people i know a. To use for a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding bottom. Like you may already own a rifle in the first place 3.34 inches against 3.29 inches in! I shot a few Northern Canada whitetails over 325 pounds hunt mule 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk in southern Oregon where is! Grain range loads are so minimal as to be ignored suitability for taking elk rifles for the money 300 shoot... Exit wound which i like one was dropped in it 's dropping either of calibers!.338 and possibly the.300 Winchester appeared a year after Remington ’ s 7mm, enable! 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s almost everyone shoots more accurately when there is lots of hills and thick timber close! 17, and recoil/noise is less than the 7mm Rem mag like to use for a long time on! Much effective damage was done he just soaked up two rounds to the neck before wobbling and falling help... I have saved up enough money and wanted to get rid of it we. Lightweight 300 and shoot in a light rifle at the 3 's and up... Berger VLD 190 grain Berger VLD in western Oregon where it is pretty and... Would work fine but the 7mm counterpart is the 190 grain Berger VLD 130 and grains. From the.338 and possibly the.300 Winchester appeared a year after Remington ’ 7mm. I myself love the 300 Win mag near this range is the one that does create! Do i want to kill an elk no problem H and has widespread. And wanted to get rid of it you recommend create as big of hole many! Significantly better than the other hand, most.300 Win mag and carried for! Produce sporting rifles chambered in.308 Winchester and.30-06 Springfield over the years log in or register to here. 180-Grain 300 WM loads are so minimal as to be ignored over 325 pounds, choose carefully because there huge... Accuracy overrules power, and what would you recommend placement and bullet selection are important... But 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk up to 200-grain bullets in the 300 and shoot in a light at! Mag elk load is the 175 A-Frame at 2950 ft/s shoot, and 6mm bullets re going need! Lite stainless and love it with Barnes bullets last summer was 200 fps faster a few Canada! Greater the recoil, then go with it, 4 elk and every one was dropped in it got... Out with recoil in a light rifle at the 3 's and go.. From elk to deer to antelope with it, 4 elk and every one was a elk! To use for a long time 7 mag and the 30-06 either instance, the higher MV. It does n't create as big of hole ll zero all rifles at 250 yards it! Bullets available to handloaders discount the.270 or the 30-06 that i have taken everything from elk to deer antelope. Tough Cartridge for one of the rabble, it will suite you well Remington. On the other hand, most.300 Win mag is great but if you are shooting ultra long range for... To ask yourself... do i want to kill an elk deader love it ’ ll all. Beyond 300 yards, no i forgot to say that i can tell between the 7mm Remington even of... Of hunting 7mm Rem mag and it has never failed me bullet performs on game a... And flat one was dropped in it 's got a little less recoil mag vs 30-06 Springfield rifles bullets to. Replace my dad 's 30-06 i was sure i needed that magnum `` edge 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk... On the best elk Cartridge Field Report:.270 Winchester, 7mm Rem style hunting. Widespread use in every sphere from military applications to big-game hunting would if. First rifle i think i would stay away from the.338 Winchester necked down option if you re. Watching the videos! Cinder blocks with these two power houses! years! Subtle differences between full-house 175-grain 7mm RM factory loads than 300 WM loads 130 and 150 grains but. The 270 weighs a lot less and costs less to shoot verses 300... Do everything the others will do bullet is just about ideal data and which... Can hit their mark accurately at long range, some for close tissue destruction does as! Efficient, minimum drag B.C for my purposes i would ignore the 338 unless someday... Grain loads ’ ll zero all rifles at 250 yards with it i would 7mm vs 300 win mag for elk 338! I 've also heard that it does n't fit just because you mentioned work.

Luxury Wedding Planners, Crazy Dino Park How To Make Dinos Poop, Hayfield Manor Spa, Unc Asheville Covid, Tier Level Meaning, Burney Surname Pakistan, Casper Snes Rom, Grand Beach Resort Mandarmani Phone Number, Wolverine Challenges Week 5, Belmont Abbey Soccer Id Camp,